Blog

SoapBlog 1 - Connecting the Dots

Posted By: Chris Bortz, 9/2/2008
Probably no surprise to anyone who pays attention to City Hall, but I think we should build a streetcar system in Cincinnati.  I began by approaching the concept with a high degree of skepticism but now have crossed over to full-throated advocate.  Not because I’m under some kind of hypnosis, but because the vision, the facts, and the numbers all add up.

So much is happening in Cincinnati - but it’s precarious, this new renaissance.  It is still fragile in its infancy. 

I’ve heard many reasonable, as well as some not so reasonable, criticisms of the plan.  Included among the reasonable are:
Where did this come from? 
Why is this “suddenly” a city priority? 
Can we afford it? 
Will anyone ride it?

To answer some of these questions, let me begin with “where did this come from?” First, the proposal isn’t new.  Discussions for building a streetcar have been around in one form or another all the way back to when the original street cars were first dismantled in the ‘50s – a deliberate move orchestrated throughout the country by the (once) Big Three auto makers so as to encourage investment in roads (see GM Charlie Wilson’s post WWII memos). 

Talk of connecting Uptown and Downtown with passenger rail has been on the table for decades.  The Metro Moves plan introduced almost eight years ago included a streetcar component, but the billion-dollar price tag for the commuter light rail and a well-intentioned, but woefully inadequate campaign turned uninformed voters off back when oil was about $23 a barrel. 

As to why this is now a city priority, our priorities have moved forward because we have actually accomplished much of what had been on our community agenda for years.  The stadiums are built, The Banks is underway, investment in OTR is ongoing under 3CDC’s leadership, Fountain Square has been remade and Findlay Market has never looked better. 

One thing hasn’t changed. Community leadership (city, county, business, institutional) still agree that the key to Cincinnati’s regional prosperity is a healthy and vibrant urban center.  Our two major job generators, Uptown and Downtown, are the lifeblood of our economy. 

What about the numbers including costs to construct, operating expenses, ridership projections, and the expected return to the community?  Well, those numbers were not pulled out of a hat.  Transportation experts and economists reached them after extensive research and analysis and review of the success of other forward thinking cities.  Then they were independently verified.  Don’t agree?  O.K., then challenge assumptions and conclusions specifically.  But don’t just tell me it doesn’t feel right.  Our community is embracing data driven decision-making.  We have the data.  Now is the time to make a decision. 

Is there a funding gap?  You bet.  No other city in the country has been able to build a streetcar system without a dedicated tax.  “You can’t do that here.  Taxes are too high,” they say.  O.K. Then let’s put our heads together and figure out how to fill the gap. 

Are there other priorities in Cincinnati?  Of course.  Our schools need to be better.  Health and poverty issues need constant attention and significant investment.  Crime must be fought aggressively.  But we are working on all of those things, and we are beginning to see results.  No one is suggesting that our streetcar plan should or would reduce funding for those ongoing priorities.  We are a big enough city that we can walk and chew gum at the same time.  Building and maintaining infrastructure is what governments do; no one else will.

Why build it?  You’ve heard the arguments.  We need more money to keep the pressure on crime, close the health gap, improve workforce development, and combat blight. We need more residents and more jobs. A streetcar, according to the experts, will help create those jobs and attract those residents and generate those new dollars as well as position our city in a competitive, global economy, create walkable neighborhoods, attract young professionals, stimulate residential development, energize retail, reduce parking pressures and  alleviate traffic congestion. But my favorite reason to do this?  To tie together all the investments we have already made or are making.  We can physically connect them.   

Time to connect the dots.
Comments:
Tuesday, September 02, 2008 10:33 AM by Vicki
I would appreciate seeing the actual data supporting ongoing ridership for the "streetcar named futile" . I live close to downtown, I take the metro to and from work in another cinci neighorhood, I use Findley market regularly and I know many people with similar habits. Who will be using this? Who travels to have lunch anymore, who takes an hour for lunch to begin with anymore? So, since you have all the numbers for ridership, lets see them.
Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11:12 AM by Nancy
Chris, I was a part of the Olympics 2012 intiative with Nick Vehr. Transportation was one of the major stumbling blocks as to why we did not receive the bid. Has anyone reviewed that report for it's suggestions from the IOC? The transportation issue is more than just street cars, we need an active regional transportation plan. I'm glad to assist with moving this forward.

Nancy P.
Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11:27 AM by anon
ridership projections are here. with methodology

http://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/city/downloads/city_pdf17768.pdf
Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11:30 AM by anon
ridership projections are here. with methodology

http://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/city/downloads/city_pdf17768.pdf
Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:54 PM by John
If someone wanted to transition their Fortune 50 company marketing skills to that of economic development, does anyone have any ideas on how to do that?

Thanks
John
Tuesday, September 02, 2008 1:25 PM by Jeffrey Stec
Nice article Chris--you hit all the right points, and included the most important thing: a call for increased dialog and creativity rather than knee jerk problem spotting. Let's identify our common goals and see how the streetcar will help solve them. Then let's see how we can figure out how to fund this thing in the context of a larger, regional transportation vision.
Wednesday, September 03, 2008 12:44 PM by Mr. Cautious
I assume Chris is pro-streetcar so his family's development company can make more money? Sounds like a conflict of interest.
Wednesday, September 03, 2008 2:28 PM by Mr. Optimist
Re Mr. Cautious's comment...taking your point to the extreme, virtually every decision and point of advocacy by Chris while serving on City Council could be viewed through that spectrum. Conflict of interest standards are not drawn quite that narrowly, and there is considerable evidence as to how the system will benefit many private parties other than the Bortz family.

I'm just curious, because it's a pretty simplistic "pot shot" for someone to take.
Thursday, September 04, 2008 12:01 PM by Sammy
I agree with Mr. Optimist, I don't think Bortz should be on City Council at all.
Leave a comment
Name
Url
Comment

Submit